Structure

No-presale finance

Construction funding for projects proceeding without qualifying presales — assessed on gross realisation, margin and the strength of the exit, not a presale hurdle.

Apartment development under construction funded without presales

What changes the funding

Without presales, the lender loses the debt cover that qualifying contracts provide — so the deal is underwritten on GRV, margin and exit instead. Private-credit senior fills the gap, typically at a lower leverage and higher rate than a presale-backed bank facility.

It's the right tool where presales would erode price or delay a start, and the margin is strong enough to carry a more conservative debt position.

PresalesNot required
LeverageMore conservative (e.g. lower % of GRV) to offset
PricingHigher than presale-backed bank senior
Key credit testMargin, builder, and a credible sell-down or refinance exit

Worked example

The same $18.0m / $12.5m reference deal, funded two ways — a bank facility that requires qualifying presales, versus a non-bank facility with no presales. No-presale finance costs more and needs less equity because it leans harder on the debt; the trade-off is a lower net margin.

Option A

Bank senior — with presales

Senior debt$8.66m
Developer equity$4.66m
Loan to value (LVR)48.1%
Loan to cost (LTC)65.0%
Senior rate8.50%
Finance cost$736,078
Development profit$4.32m
Return on equity92.6%

Lower rate, but sales must be achieved before or during construction. Larger equity cheque; strongest margin.

Option B

Non-bank senior — no presales

Senior debt$9.81m
Developer equity$3.82m
Loan to value (LVR)54.5%
Loan to cost (LTC)72.0%
Senior rate10.50%
Finance cost$1,030,310
Development profit$4.01m
Return on equity105.1%

Start without presales and sell into completion. Higher rate and lower margin, but speed to market and less pre-commitment.

Illustrative only — actual leverage, pricing and presale tests depend on the lender, market and project.

When it's the right structure

No-presale finance suits well-margined projects where presales would discount pricing or delay the program, and the developer would rather sell completed stock into the market.

Advantages and limitations

Advantages: start without waiting on presales; capture completed-stock pricing. Limitations: lower leverage and higher cost, so more equity is required up front.

Related services

Frequently asked questions

Can I fund a development with no presales?

Yes. Private-credit senior can proceed without qualifying presales, assessing the deal on GRV, development margin, builder capability and the exit. It's priced higher than a presale-backed bank senior to reflect the absent cover.

Why proceed without presales?

Because presales can be slow, discount your pricing, or simply not materialise in the current market — and completed stock often sells at a higher price than off-the-plan. No-presale funding lets a well-margined project start now rather than wait.

What do lenders require instead of presales?

A conservative leverage position, a strong development margin, a capable builder on a fixed-price contract, and a credible sell-down or refinance exit. The absent presale cover is replaced by a lower LVR and a higher rate.

Building without presales?

Talk to BluCow